Share Your Opinions on Building a More Connected Yarbo Forum

Hello everyone,

We’re excited to see how much you value our forum as a space to share suggestions, discuss product-related topics, and connect with fellow enthusiasts. Your participation means a lot to us, and we’re committed to making this community even more vibrant and engaging.

To enhance your experience, we’re considering expanding the forum’s focus. Our vision is to make it a place where Yarbo enthusiasts can not only talk about Yarbo-related topics but also explore other interests and passions, such as hobbies, lifestyle, and outdoor adventures. We also recognize that many of you might be interested in connecting with others offline, and we’re looking into ways to facilitate this as well.

Before we move forward, we’d love to hear your thoughts on these ideas. Do you support this direction for the forum? Any feedback or suggestions you have will be greatly appreciated!

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,

Team Yarbo

1 Like

@Yarbo-Forum - Facebook is for that social stuff. Keep the Forum as Yarbo only, with largely technical issues and feature discussions as we have been. I prefer something clean and to the point for the time I spend on all things Yarbo on Social Media.

I love the tracking summary here on the Forum – that was brill, Yarbo Team! Do you know how many people I send to it?

I’m finding myself doing Forum first and then looking at Facebook second when I have time, where it was the opposite not long ago. Forum is just such a better reading experience.

If the volume keeps increasing as it has, and if others are stepping in to help those with questions and issues, I may start limiting my Facebook time with its repeated questions, grousing, and blind links to Lymow because Yarbo customers have $7000 paperweights. Ahhh, welcome to the Internet! :laughing:

My suggestion would be a Wiki where we as customers can contribute and tweak to address FAQs and issues in CustomerSpeak. I’d rather spend my creative time contributing to a Wiki than on Facebook where I’ll answer something and it disappears. Does the Forum have a Wiki component? I don’t want to administer anything, just contribute.

8 Likes

Completely agree. Discord and Facebook for the social aspects. This should be mostly business.

I absolutely want to see a wiki. It’s desperately needed.

5 Likes

I’m of the opinion that this forum is busy enough without social noise.

That said,
We WILL someday need a regional Yarbo Racing subtopic.
1 - manually driven races using SmartVision
2 - a 200 meter pathed circuit between 20 yarbos and let collision avoidance fight it out
3 - mud-bog challenge

Some day, YarboTeam. Some day.

6 Likes

I love the forums as they are. Great place to get ideas and hash out technical problems. A wiki might be nice although it can become a free for all. As for the Facebook group. I’ve never laid eyes on it. Killed my Facebook account many years ago and am not going back.

3 Likes

I agree with the others. I like the forums as they are. Don’t need the socials here (in fact, I’ve been weaning myself off FB because it’s been so draining).

Once the API is ready though, I’d like to see an area for that. I’d really like to see what types of integrations folks work out!

I love Home Assistant, so it would be nice to figure out how to make them talk so I could log data locally, enhance weather delay options, adjust scheduled runs (enable/disable), track maintenance hours, etc. A forum section for that type of discussion might be nice.

3 Likes

I’d also like to suggest a feature and suggestion section merge of similar topics. It seems so many come here and don’t check the current list. A quick search usually will come up with the topic if one exists. Also it suggests similar topics as you type. It would be ideal if the duplicates get merged together so it’s not so daunting for users and Yarbo to keep track of. Maybe there’s a better way to allow people to suggest features and changes. Open to more ideas here on that topic. I also hope Yarbo is capturing some of the side conversations on the suggestions themselves as there is usually some good feedback on how to better implement it, use it, or if it would be counter to what someone else is expecting/wanting.

4 Likes

Socials and lifestyle discussions might be more suitable in Discord! It allows real-time interactions like a live chat and live feedback which I imagine will be good for continuous social discussion.

1 Like

I’m really intrigued by your idea of a community-editable Wiki to capture “CustomerSpeak” FAQs and tweaks. Right now our official Support Center is locked down—only Yarbo staff can create or edit articles. Could you share more details on how you’d envision contributing by having Wiki? Can it be also achived on our support center if we, for example, have a section in the forum dedicated to Community written articles and information, once approved we will be updating it to our support center?

4 Likes

(Sorry, folks, this got way too much TL, so DR if you know what’s good for you. Just Marco – you’re on the hook, 'cuz you asked! LOL!)


Hi @marco - There are a few levels here to consider. Bottom line: Yarbo is a COMPLEX product with some level of skill/knowledge required to install and use, and the more clear resources available the better, from documents to FAQs, all of it searchable and easy to find things. Folks want help, usually immediately, and post on social media to get a quick solution. Capturing that could provide help to others and lessen the burden on Support.

If you look at the FB posts, you’ll notice A LOT of information shared by a growing number of people who are gaining experience, with some technical folks chipping in to set us straight. Has Yarbo taken some of that information and distilled it into KB Articles? Or taken what is posted and made product corrections so the issue doesn’t happen anymore? If not, it’s a missed opportunity. (I have asked in a tech discussion if Yarbo takes that input for future improvement in the product, and the answer is YES, so that’s cool.)

So all this magical capturing of ideas for documentation and FAQs and distillation and all that is great, right? I am sure it is difficult and time-consuming to maintain those things. Documentation alone is a full time job. What if there were some people who were available to contribute to the KB, FAQs, or a Wiki? Yarbo already has volunteers to give product demos and help people set up. This could be another such a thing.

  • KB Articles. These are essential and must remain simple, clear, and searchable. Some are outdated, incorrect, incomplete, and have formatting issues. There is sometimes a mix of 23 and 24 material. Nice lists of document titles, searchable – cool — and I think nicely laid out and presented. Breaking it up into modules with the same answers across modules because it applies to the core may be a little confusing and redundant. Eh, that’s the Editor’s problem. LOL! I reference the diagnostics description page all the time, but even that needs more clarity.
  • FAQs. There are zero FAQs anywhere. How many times are we asked the same questions on Facebook and the Forum? Take my answers (corrected by @bryan.wheeler or some other smart person), cut the number of TL;DR words down, and make a FAQ. Who does it? Where does it live? I had pondered adding a FAQ as a document tied to one of the Facebook Groups.
  • Forum Feature Summary List. Great stuff, needs to be clarified a bit, kept up to date with status, maybe include important bugs in addition to future features. I used to maintain the bug and feature databases for my software projects. Always clean as a whistle, searchable, clear, and distinct, with no duplicates. An effort to maintain.
  • Wiki. I am assuming such an entity exists where you can create your own Wiki or it’s part of what the Forum infrastructure offers, but I don’t know, as I never looked into it. Typically a Wiki, which is basically a web site of informative articles, is maintained by a group of users (I assume authorized) who create, modify, approve, and patrol the content. I don’t know if it’s typical for a company like Yarbo to have its own Wiki and who would edit it, or if there’s a web site where Wikis live that anyone can create. Inviting user contributions may be what differentiates between a Wiki and other documentation related to a company’s product.

The question is what Yarbo would find valuable for its current and coming customers. This is YOUR company, Marco. What I see on Facebook speaks volumes to me about what is needed. I think in the last week alone about 5 or 10 people asked about varying Pathways – and there it is on the Forum’s feature summary page (which is why I like that page a lot). Unfortunately it takes investment to do this work, and it may be sufficient that more people are answering posts on Facebook now and providing quick responses, leaving the tough ones for Support to handle. Maybe that’s enough? Or maybe seeing a lot of “I have this problem!” on FB is not painting a good picture. I don’t know where that line is, but there are some people out there making hay on the bad stuff, with rumors that someone is making a documentary or maybe putting together a court case and is collecting information, so who knows.

Just something for your thoughts, Yarbo Marco + Team. I don’t think I’m breaking any new ground here, just something I’m sure we all ponder about, but we also know Yarbo needs to have resources focused on other higher priority customer satisfaction things at the moment – I’m always looking forward to the upcoming fixes, improvements, and features.

6 Likes

I completely agree as well. There’s plenty of other platforms for “socializing”. Let’s keep this Yarbo focused!

4 Likes

Rather than a separate wiki, what about enabling certain users (who have achieved a certain level of trust) to propose edits for review to the actual KB articles. This is similar to the tech world where users can draft an edit to something (code, documentation, etc), and provide it for consideration to be included into the published version (pull request).

Unless you are envisioning the Wiki to provide a different scope of information from the KBs.

1 Like

It’s up to Yarbo how they want to slice it and if it’s worth having a process that they’d want to monitor to allow someone like Bry…I mean me to edit some articles for THEIR web site. This is their face to the world.

I was thinking a Wiki because in general it’s designed to have various contributors, which is good and bad, so there’d have to be a gatekeeper at some level if done kind of in association with the company. If an independent Wiki? It’s anyone’s ballgame.

Opening up the KB Articles for authorized users to create and edit is certainly an option to consider instead of a Wiki. That may work better in this case because the system is in place already and people know where to go. The information is kinda there but can use updates and additional articles based on what we’re encountering in the real world and reflected in social media. I imagine Yarbo Support would request KB Articles for such-and-such topics as well.

And then you get all the questions about “who” will monitor what’s going on, “who” does the work, what’s the commitment level, are any international laws being violated if it’s done pro bono, who makes sure a certain someone doesn’t use the word __________ again 'cuz he got a complaint, and so on. It’s all stuff Yarbo would have to consider.

2 Likes

I’d be willing to help and have previously offered to. Definitely think a wiki is the way to go for the documentation, KB, etc.

4 Likes

I don’t believe social media is a force for good in our world, so I don’t use it. I would not support Yarbo having a forum for anything other than strictly Yarbo stuff.
That said, I gotta say I do really like the forum. It gives an opportunity to see issues and applications others are seeing.

Tim

4 Likes

Thank you so much for this incredibly thorough feedback! Your insights are truly invaluable. We’ll take all of these points into account as we refine our KB and exploring a more collaborative editing model at the same time. I’ll share to users if any updates or plans are made, and look forward to your continued input!

4 Likes