Most companies would be deep diving the competition and make sure they offer equivalent features at minimum, plus add an improvement twist. I can’t figure out Yarbo’s thought process. My best guess is that early software architecture decisions have locked them into something that isn’t very flexible.
Or they don’t know how to, lol.
It’s evident they took the bottom half of the coding graduates 
Funny enough I think their focus is user feedback. Indeed they could look at the competition, probably a good, but I will say that the competition is not always customer focused. So be it as it may, my best suggestion is be vocal, speak up. Use the boards whether facebook or this forumn. I see and feel they listen. Vote and comment on those things you truly feel is an improvement or even a negative.
I would say when discussing lawn care having the lines in your yard align is a pretty easy conclusion come to and not have to take it to a vote.
I honestly can not disagree with your comment. Most like the nice striping, I feel this is a given. When it all aligns it really creates nice curb appeal. I will keep posting so this stays up, as it is important to me.
An option here would be to use heading degrees for the alignment instead of the offset. Mow starting at 10deg for path and that would allow alignment easily as a user.
I was going to submit the exact same request. I hope this gets serious consideration. If all areas initially had 0 degrees route angle, and 0 degrees was true ( or magnetic) north, it would be a to set the same stripe angles on multiple areas. And, I could easily use a compass to determine my desired angle.
Honestly just set so that all plans align to a same compass heading. From there it would be easy.